
In 1992 the applicant, a citizen of present-day Croatia, applied to remain in Canada as a permanent resident through a special program in existence at the time for citizens of the former Yugoslavia. The Government of Canada lost that application. The applicant then applied to stay on humanitarian grounds and was refused because of miscommunication with his former representative. The Government of Canada promised they were still looking for the original 1992 application and they would inform him of the results. They never did.
In 2020, the applicant applied for permanent residence on humanitarian and compassionate grounds again. The Government of Canada refused that application, completing misunderstanding the reasons for which the applicant stayed in Canada for so long without status, and ignoring the Government’s failures that led to this.
Anchor Law succeeded in a judicial review of the negative decision in Federal Court. The Court agreed that the decision was mistaken and sent it back to another officer for redetermination. Soon after, the application was accepted, and after three decades with no legal status in Canada the applicant is finally a permanent resident.
Reasons and judgment
Lalic v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 972 (CanLII)
Latest Notable Cases

Spousal sponsorship – appeal – genuineness of the marriage – Nepal – 2020
Asylum – appeal – political opinion/activism – Mexico – 2019
Asylum – appeal – political opinion – Turkey – 2018
How to engage Anchor Law?
Feel free to get in touch!
1. Message us and tell us more about how we can help you. You can do it here.
2. We schedule a meeting to determine what are the next steps in your immigration journey.
3. You decide whether you want to proceed with Anchor Law as your representative.
“If you require legal advice and representation, I hope to be your guide through the legal process with full transparency and on the basis of a solid strategy.”

Aleksandar Jeremic
